CVA Modality
Operating Standards
Safe, accessible and effective mechanism(s) are identified to deliver CVA, based on situation analysis and size of the cash program to be delivered
Key Actions
- Identify the most appropriate modality or combination of modalities as part of a cash plus approach or complementary programing approach.
- IFRC/IRCR Cash in Emergencies Toolkit
- Comparing Cash Transfer Programming (CTP) modality & mechanism
- Advantages disadvantages CTP modalities
- Response Intervention Options
- Mobile money requirements checklist
- Value card requirements checklist
- E-transfer requirements checklist
- Assessing mobile money template
- Assessing service providers checklist
- IFRC/IRCR Cash in Emergencies Toolkit
- Select the delivery mechanism(s) and Financial Service Providers (FSP) for the programme based on the following dimensions: Infrastructure/geographic services; cash/monetary considerations; system reporting & data protection; reliability, flexibility and scale; time and speed; beneficiary interface, protection, and acceptance (equal access) ; risk; organisational alignment/ease of implementation; cost-effectiveness; resilience, financial inclusion, and secondary impacts. Also take into consideration the fact that delivery mechanisms for CVA are responsive to the unique needs of vulnerable and marginalized subgroups of the target populations.
- IFRC/IRCR Cash in Emergencies Toolkit
- Mercy Corps Toolkit
- UNHCR Cash Delivery Mechanism Assessment Tool (CDMAT)
- For Hawala: CWG Somalia Guidelines: How to use Hawala in Somalia
- For SRHR programming : Consider factors of marginalization and how this may hinder access to the CVA delivery mechanisms and SRH services
- Design targeted strategies for outreach and awareness-raising on CVA responsive to the unique needs of various gender groups. Design option for hard to reach populations and those gender groups with special needs