2.1.4 Phase 4 – Evaluation
| Recommended Actions | Minimum Questions |
| Review programming against conflict sensitivity benchmarks:
• Context • Programming impacts • Monitoring process • Adaptation/Sensitivity |
• Is the conflict situation deteriorating or improving?
• How have changes in the context affected CARE’s programming? • How has CAREs work had a positive or negative impact on tension and cohesion in the area. • How often are CARE and partner staff meeting to discuss complaints and unexpected negative effects of CARE’s work? • Is the feedback system working well? • Is CARE’s communication strategy ensuring that CARE provides all relevant information in a way which is accessible to beneficiaries and local communities? • What programming changes have been made in response to complaints? Has that eased tensions? • What further changes could be made to improve relations and reduce violence and tension in the programming area? |
| Deliver training to address gaps in partner and CARE staff knowledge | • Are there gaps in the areas of IHL, gender, conflict sensitivity and accountability? |